5 ms·

Wait a second. None of the demos are the actual company's page but are clones with the company's images. https://natuive.net/demos/hasselblad/ https://natuive.

Wait a second. None of the demos are the actual company's page but are clones with the company's images. https://natuive.net/demos/hasselblad/ https://natuive.net/demos/hasselblad/ uses natUIve, but https://www.hasselblad.com/ https://www.hasselblad.com/ doesn't. https://natuive.net/demos/postbank/ https://natuive.net/demos/postbank/ uses natUIve, but https://www.postbank.bg/ https://www.postbank.bg/ doesn't. https://natuive.net/demos/tutsplus/ https://natuive.net/demos/tutsplus/ uses natUIve, but https://tutsplus.com/ https://tutsplus.com/ doesn't. https://natuive.net/demos/cnn-travel/ https://natuive.net/demos/cnn-travel/ uses natUIve, but https://www.cnn.com/travel https://www.cnn.com/travel doesn't. etc. I've never seen this practice before. Is this common? Sites like https://threejs.org/ https://threejs.org/ only list projects that actually use the library.

ckluis 8y ago
I think it would have been more honest if it said: see the following pages rebuilt with NatUIve.
- rado 8y ago
  Done, thanks!
  - ckluis 8y ago
    To really it hit it home, I would have put something like: Original: 15,000 Classes, 2mb Reimplemented: 1,200 Classes, 20kb All those are fake numbers, it would have shown the "lightweight" concept.
stronglikedan 8y ago
I've seen that before, but the demos actually looked like the sites they were meant to represent, a la recreations, and not just similar to them. Also, I guess 35 demos is technically dozens, but I might have described the quantity a bit differently. Really, that whole site just looks and acts odd to me.
- rado 8y ago
  Hi, those are demos based on actual sites, in order to demonstrate versatility. Please describe what is odd and how it should be done properly? What would you want from such library/framework? Thanks
  - dewey 8y ago
    I think I'd make it very clear that these are real sites re-implemented to show that it can be done in the framework. Not just list them without an explanation to imply that they are using the framework. You are using their brands to boost yours even though they are unrelated. So I'd either build sites that look similar but don't have real logos / names which should be enough to show what kind of things are possible with the framework or if you want to stick to the re-implementations of real sites add something like: "Reimplemented real world examples"
    - rado 8y ago
      Will do that now, thank you.
  - x0x0 8y ago
    At minimum, use robots to keep crawlers out of these sites. Or you're going to be getting letters. Cloning people's content in ways google finds isn't cool.
    - rado 8y ago
      Thank you, adding rule to robots.txt. Regards
rolleiflex 8y ago
It's not common, first time I'm seeing as well, and I'm a designer — I check out these kind of things often. It's misleading. It should be made very obvious that those are recreations and not the actual websites. Also, likely copyright infringement on multiple counts. (Not a lawyer, though.)
- rado 8y ago
  Thanks, amended. Cheers
rado 8y ago
Thanks for the note, updated with more clarity. Cheers

ckluis 8y ago

I think it would have been more honest if it said: see the following pages rebuilt with NatUIve.

rado 8y ago
Done, thanks!
- ckluis 8y ago
  To really it hit it home, I would have put something like: Original: 15,000 Classes, 2mb Reimplemented: 1,200 Classes, 20kb All those are fake numbers, it would have shown the "lightweight" concept.

stronglikedan 8y ago

I've seen that before, but the demos actually looked like the sites they were meant to represent, a la recreations, and not just similar to them. Also, I guess 35 demos is technically dozens, but I might have described the quantity a bit differently. Really, that whole site just looks and acts odd to me.

rado 8y ago
Hi, those are demos based on actual sites, in order to demonstrate versatility. Please describe what is odd and how it should be done properly? What would you want from such library/framework? Thanks
- dewey 8y ago
  I think I'd make it very clear that these are real sites re-implemented to show that it can be done in the framework. Not just list them without an explanation to imply that they are using the framework. You are using their brands to boost yours even though they are unrelated. So I'd either build sites that look similar but don't have real logos / names which should be enough to show what kind of things are possible with the framework or if you want to stick to the re-implementations of real sites add something like: "Reimplemented real world examples"
  - rado 8y ago
    Will do that now, thank you.
- x0x0 8y ago
  At minimum, use robots to keep crawlers out of these sites. Or you're going to be getting letters. Cloning people's content in ways google finds isn't cool.
  - rado 8y ago
    Thank you, adding rule to robots.txt. Regards

rolleiflex 8y ago

It's not common, first time I'm seeing as well, and I'm a designer — I check out these kind of things often. It's misleading. It should be made very obvious that those are recreations and not the actual websites. Also, likely copyright infringement on multiple counts. (Not a lawyer, though.)

rado 8y ago
Thanks, amended. Cheers

rado 8y ago

Thanks for the note, updated with more clarity. Cheers