3 ms·
Don't be ridiculous. 1. It's not ugly 2. It's how CPUs work 3. It's how most people think
by axod 16y ago
Don't be ridiculous.
1. It's not ugly
2. It's how CPUs work
3. It's how most people think
- philwelch 16y ago1. By ugly, I mean less mathematically elegant. In Ruby, you say "paul.foo" and get foo from Paul. How Paul gets foo for you is up to Paul. Simple. 2. If you want a programming language that maps closely to how CPU's work, Ruby's definitely not for you. Assembly and C are for you. 3. I can't speak for most people. What I can say is that I can think in C and I can think in Ruby, and it doesn't seem difficult for me.