3 ms·
I don't see why it would be different, either. I'm just unaware of it being a common phenomenon here in the US. Perhaps I'm mistaken. My main point is that the
by mmt 16y ago
I don't see why it would be different, either. I'm just unaware of it being a common phenomenon here in the US. Perhaps I'm mistaken.
My main point is that there are cases where the private sector can do without unions, whereas the public sector schools cannot[1].
[1] At least in California I haven't heard of a single non-unionized public school.
- igrekel 16y agoI believe it is just a question of the number of employees and of when the organization started. Want it or not, the state is a large and visible employer.