3 ms·
In a perfect world, I’d agree with you. The author of the article you linked to provides a good answer to this problem: If your audience is architecturally
by iampims 16y ago
In a perfect world, I’d agree with you. The author of the article you linked to provides a good answer to this problem:
If your audience is architecturally minded and aware of REST,
you should version data representations in the MIME
types your application accepts.
If your clients view the URL as the most important facet,
make the URL the center of your versioning efforts.
Folks who are familiar with versioning with WS-* Web
services tend to be more comfortable with changing the
URL when versions change.
- tomzeng 16y agoBoth approaches should work, putting version in the url seemed to be more widely used, we will take both in to consideration, thanks for the suggestions