Agreed. I think what this may mean going forward is that the CAAs are going to have to consider demanding that the training specifications be designed around a

Agreed. I think what this may mean going forward is that the CAAs are going to have to consider demanding that the training specifications be designed around a scenario where some (as-yet-to-be-defined) subset of the smart systems are disabled, and if the airframe behaves differently in that configuration, it demands re-training. I'm somewhat surprised acceptance criteria weren't already there. You don't plan for the common case when lives are on the line.