4 ms·
It's odd to call the airframe "faulty" when (a) it flies and (b) the FAA requirements for positive static stability in the airframe itself don't forbid the 737
by fixermark 8y ago
It's odd to call the airframe "faulty" when (a) it flies and (b) the FAA requirements for positive static stability in the airframe itself don't forbid the 737 MAX from being flown.
Does the author mean the FAA airframe acceptance criteria are faulty?