3 ms·
> This is schizophrenic at best, verging on brain-dead/bananas most of the time. Given how many people have let their kids drain their bank account by letting
by fao_ 8y ago
> This is schizophrenic at best, verging on brain-dead/bananas most of the time.
Given how many people have let their kids drain their bank account by letting them play on their phone, I disagree.
- random878 8y agoYou are mixing up two separate things.
- fao_ 8y agoClear proof that the majority of parents have neither the effort, the energy, nor the inclination to pay attention to what their children do while on their phone, to the extent of losing thousands of pounds of money (or in some cases, hundreds of thousands of pounds) and, the children's ability to access porn through their parent's mobile phone over a phone network, are unrelated? That doesn't seem the case to me. In my experience, even very innocent searches can (unfortunately, and unexpectedly) bring up porn-related material.
- NeedMoreTea 8y agoHow is that related to the network's brain-dead/bananas blocking of completely irrelevant discussion, blog or art sites 25% of the time, or not blocking sites or subreddits that are often just as iffy as any xxx site? Regardless of view on whether "for the children" blocking of porn is good or bad, everyone doing so seems to have proven utterly hopeless at it. Hopeless for those who prefer to see it, and those who prefer not to. It's inept all around.