Cisco have a loong history of things like the. I mean go back to 2005 when they actually sent people to a security conference to rip pages out of the handouts

Cisco have a loong history of things like the. I mean go back to 2005 when they actually sent people to a security conference to rip pages out of the handouts that mentioned a security vulnerability in their products (https://www.computerworld.com/article/2482483/cisco-s-blunder.html https://www.computerworld.com/article/2482483/cisco-s-blunde...) That (and other bad security responses) have not really hurt them, so at this stage, this won't make a lot of difference, I'd expect.