3 ms·
Is rate of fire really a blocker for US artillery? Can't they just bring more guns?
by dmurray 8y ago
Is rate of fire really a blocker for US artillery? Can't they just bring more guns?
- GarvielLoken 8y ago1 rpm sustained fire is extremely low. That's like a magnitude worse than the other modern alternatives. All others also fire atleast twice as fast and for almost 150% of the distance. Also sense the gun is that bad it creates a self reinforcing effect, why would you want more of it if it's bad?