3 ms·
There's no reason the scale needs to be the same when comparing measurements in totally different dimensions. The weight is roughly a volume measurement while
by function_seven 8y ago
There's no reason the scale needs to be the same when comparing measurements in totally different dimensions.
The weight is roughly a volume measurement while the neck size is a linear one. Also, if the necks were measured in inches, you'd end up at roughly the original chart, even being mindful of the scaling on each axis.
I think the left chart is actually the better one. It does a good job showing the correlation between neck size and weight.
- Quenty 8y agoIt’s a matter of percent change. It shows the same relative percent change on the scale, which feels more accurate. I prefer the revised graph.
- gowld 8y ago> > The weight is roughly a volume measurement while the neck size is a linear one. so "percent change" is a different dimension in the two data sets, respectively.