4 ms·
Hmm, I wonder if "genderless" will be more distracting than a clearly male or female voice. It seems unnatural.
by phaedryx 8y ago
Hmm, I wonder if "genderless" will be more distracting than a clearly male or female voice. It seems unnatural.
- daenz 8y agoI'm half serious when I say this, but calling it "unnatural" can border on intolerance, for somewhat obvious reasons.
- zamalek 8y agoIf we could figure out how to make a genderless voice, then it would be intolerant. This is not a gender neutral voice. It sounds like it's cycling between female-type and male-type voices with a very strong bias towards female-type. I applaud the effort, but it falls very short. The voice itself is intolerant because it's almost a parody.
- phaedryx 8y agoYeah, I think that's it. If it were consistent it would work much better.