Cool, morality determined by ad revenue opportunities. What could go wrong? Clearly nobody is going to shed any tears over Nazis... but is it wrong to support

Cool, morality determined by ad revenue opportunities. What could go wrong? Clearly nobody is going to shed any tears over Nazis... but is it wrong to support Palestinian claims to Jerusalem? Where's the line? I don't like this move since I feel it will just push people into places where we can't determine real identification, should that be needed after a crime. I don't like this move because I don't, fundamentally, think we should all have to agree with Zuck to have a voice online. I don't like this move because it's reactionary, and there's no consistent philosophy behind why these groups would be banned but not others. Just feels skeezy to censor people, no matter how skeezy those people are.