4 ms·
> If they could move to the corresponding inner suburb on the other side, and pay the same rent, that would be a substantial saving for them, at no cost to anyo
by vonmoltke 8y ago
> If they could move to the corresponding inner suburb on the other side, and pay the same rent, that would be a substantial saving for them, at no cost to anyone else.
Why do you assume they would want to? I don't want to move every time I switch to a job in a different part of town.
- lmm 8y ago> Why do you assume they would want to? Because commuting is unpleasant. > I don't want to move every time I switch to a job in a different part of town. Then don't! It should be a free choice. You shouldn't get special tax treatment for moving, you shouldn't get special tax treatment for staying still.