Oh, they're bad at communication, all right, and not just because of some spelling error. Look at the description of their flagship product: http://www.starlin

Oh, they're bad at communication, all right, and not just because of some spelling error. Look at the description of their flagship product: http://www.starling-software.com/en/qam.html http://www.starling-software.com/en/qam.html What does it do? Who would use it? For what? I have absolutely no idea, and I don't think I'm the absolute dimmest light in the Christmas tree. They use totally general words like "component" without explaining what they mean to them in this context. A component could be an object which implements a specific API, or a set of files with version information attached, or whatever. I don't feel like I know anything about QAM after reading that page. And I don't feel like continuing to learn about it, either. Anyway, I do realize that Starling had nothing to do with submitting this to HN, but I still think they deserve some flameage for the general sense smugness and self-congratulation which one gets from their website, especially since those don't seem be backed up by any world-beating performance.