3 ms·
Containing costs -> multi mission -> giant weird beast. I don't think we disagree. Still, I think the point about it being a backstop to unmanned aerial asset
by lallysingh 8y ago
Containing costs -> multi mission -> giant weird beast. I don't think we disagree.
Still, I think the point about it being a backstop to unmanned aerial assets stands. I don't know if it needs to be optimized for any single mission when it's likely to be a worse choice than one of those assets.