> Tech jobs have little to do with SFs housing problem, tech is just a convenient scapegoat. You say that without giving an alternative explanation. If it's no

> Tech jobs have little to do with SFs housing problem, tech is just a convenient scapegoat. You say that without giving an alternative explanation. If it's not the tech jobs (and the jobs built around them) that raised demand so much, what else is it? > In the 80s the blame was finance. Again, why do you assume that finance was just the scapegoat, not the actual reason?