5 ms·

I'd care because it shows that the candidate cares about their craft to the point that they are trying to share their opinions with others. Granted, the vast ma

by lrm242 16y ago

I'd care because it shows that the candidate cares about their craft to the point that they are trying to share their opinions with others. Granted, the vast majority of people in the world don't blog, so in my mind its only a "plus", but being able to read someone's written thoughts does give you extra-credit insight into their way of practicing their art (given the blog is on topic, of course).

Tyrannosaurs 16y ago
But surely you get credit based on what you write, not just for writing it? There are some pretty bad blogs out there and, IMHO at least, it wouldn't take much to write something which was worse than not writing at all. Caring about your craft is good but whether they're actually good at their craft is best judged by the content of what they are posting rather than it's mere existence.
- lrm242 16y ago
  I guess I wasn't explicit enough with this bit of my comment: "give you extra-credit insight into their way of practicing their art". Certainly simply having a blog and spouting drivel doesn't benefit a candidate, but I sort of expected that to be understood.
- mcherm 16y ago
  To me, a candidate who has a tech-oriented blog (and has maintained it for some time) gets a big bonus. One who has a GOOD tech-oriented blog is a whole other story -- that puts you in the category of people who can skip the normal evaluation process. But GOOD blogs are rare enough that I've never seen this come up. Even poor blogs are a very good sign.
axod 16y ago
idk I think it can mean that they're egotistical, stuck in their ways, believe their way is the only way to do things etc. (For example 37 signals type blogs) It can also mean they'd rather write blogs than code. Obviously it depends, but I don't think having a blog is necessarily a bonus and could well be a negative.
- j_baker 16y ago
  ...or it could mean that they really like writing, and that's a useful skill.

by lrm242 16y ago

Tyrannosaurs 16y ago

But surely you get credit based on what you write, not just for writing it? There are some pretty bad blogs out there and, IMHO at least, it wouldn't take much to write something which was worse than not writing at all. Caring about your craft is good but whether they're actually good at their craft is best judged by the content of what they are posting rather than it's mere existence.

lrm242 16y ago
I guess I wasn't explicit enough with this bit of my comment: "give you extra-credit insight into their way of practicing their art". Certainly simply having a blog and spouting drivel doesn't benefit a candidate, but I sort of expected that to be understood.
mcherm 16y ago
To me, a candidate who has a tech-oriented blog (and has maintained it for some time) gets a big bonus. One who has a GOOD tech-oriented blog is a whole other story -- that puts you in the category of people who can skip the normal evaluation process. But GOOD blogs are rare enough that I've never seen this come up. Even poor blogs are a very good sign.

axod 16y ago

idk I think it can mean that they're egotistical, stuck in their ways, believe their way is the only way to do things etc. (For example 37 signals type blogs) It can also mean they'd rather write blogs than code. Obviously it depends, but I don't think having a blog is necessarily a bonus and could well be a negative.

j_baker 16y ago
...or it could mean that they really like writing, and that's a useful skill.