4 ms·
The problem is that housing needs change. In fact: > Once you've got enough rooms to cover everyone's needs (kids don't have to share a room etc) This would
by EADGBE 8y ago
The problem is that housing needs change.
In fact:
> Once you've got enough rooms to cover everyone's needs
(kids don't have to share a room etc)
This would have been considered opulence 40 years ago.
- vonmoltke 8y agoEven a master bedroom that could fit a king bed without crowding out other furniture as opulence at one point. My wife and I just finished an open house blitz of 30s vintage colonials in New Jersey, and the vast majority could barely fit a queen in the master.
- Nition 8y agoI agree, although what I meant there was that's about the point where making the house bigger stops providing any meaningful improvement. I know it's possible to make do with a lot less.