2 ms·
People in general are largely incapable or unwilling to think. If they were willing to actually think through these laws, they would never write them nor suppo
by blunte 8y ago
People in general are largely incapable or unwilling to think. If they were willing to actually think through these laws, they would never write them nor support them.
I would ask the politicians and the supporters of this law to define "porn". Who gets to decide what is considered porn? Will that take into account religious beliefs? Will it consider regional norms? Which religion? Which region?
- DanBC 8y agoI mean, the law is stupid but your questions are trivially easy to answer and are the kind of thing English courts are well used to dealing with. Pornnis material designed to sexually titillate. This is why you can still buy American Beauty in England, even though it contains an image of a semi-naked underage actress in it. Your comments about religion at ebaffling and I have no idea what point you're trying to make. If you're suggesting that religious minorities who dislike ankles could somehow get websites showing ankles to be put behind an age wall, well, no that's not going to happen.