2 ms·
You often have to enter your email address twice and click a confirmation link to sign up to even the most straightforward mailing lists. But to vote on legisl
by gpmcadam 8y ago
You often have to enter your email address twice and click a confirmation link to sign up to even the most straightforward mailing lists.
But to vote on legislation affecting literally hundreds of millions of people for generations, just hit a button and there's no going back.
- tialaramex 8y agoBut there /is/ always going back. That's the thing. They can decide tomorrow, or next week, or next year that actually Article 13 is a bad idea and revoke it. There are reasons to support a different mechanism for voting, but the idea that this is irrevocable and so needs safeguards to prevent mistakes is not one.
- benmmurphy 8y agothe EU parliament can't actually trigger a vote by themselves. I think it requires the EU commission to introduce the legislation. so if parliament believes it made a mistake and the commission won't support them then there is no going back. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/powers-and-procedures/legislative-powers http://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/powers-and... 'A Member of the European Parliament, working in one of the parliamentary committees, draws up a report on a proposal for a ‘legislative text’ presented by the European Commission, the only institution empowered to initiate legislation.' I guess in a way the EU commission has a similar Veto power that the US president has except it possible for the legislature in the US to override the President's Veto power.