4 ms·
If you have almost no guarantees to provide, almost any solution would have worked. In other words, you claim it worked for years, but anything would if you ca
by rujuladanh 8y ago
If you have almost no guarantees to provide, almost any solution would have worked.
In other words, you claim it worked for years, but anything would if you can lose all data, reboot it, have no real-time requirements, etc.
In summary, it is not really a useful data point on whether MongoDB is useful or not.
- leejo 8y ago> If you have almost no guarantees to provide, almost any solution would have worked. Within reason. If the failure rate is 1 in 1000 then it's probably not as a big a concern as 1 in 10 depending on your use case > In summary, it is not really a useful data point on whether MongoDB is useful or not. As I said in the last sentence - it worked perfectly. In other words the "no guarantees to provide" never actually came up and I don't recall us having any data loss, response time, or write issues.