3 ms·
Heh. That 0.001% of malicious users will just stick to old cars or modify their new ones. Gas emissions and loud noises are set to be gone pretty soon anyway.
by mantas 8y ago
Heh. That 0.001% of malicious users will just stick to old cars or modify their new ones.
Gas emissions and loud noises are set to be gone pretty soon anyway.
Or are you just too self centered to see through your own narrow minded BS?
- x38iq84n 8y agoDownvote all you like, but it won't change a thing that those wilfully reckless drivers just won't get a new car with these limiters or will disable them and will not be impacted, unlike the millions of others who are forced to pay for more useless gadgets in their cars.
- claudius 8y agoIt will simply eventually become illegal to run without these limiters just as it is already illegal to use particularly polluting cars in cities (for example). Of course it will also be illegal to disable them. I don’t see how what you’re describing is any sort of credible loop-hole.
- x38iq84n 8y agoYou are already admitting that the current proposal will solve nothing, but will require further steps: prosecuting tampering with the limiters, prosecuting driving a car without them (even unknowingly [!]) and so on. All of that to ineffectively substitute the actual work of the police at the expense of every car owner.
- claudius 8y agoSorry? Cars are checked regularly (at least every two years for example in Germany) where any tampering can be detected and either reversed or further registration for the car refused. This system is already in place and the process of checking brakes, the engine, lights etc only needs to be amended by a process to check this system. I don’t see how this requires substantial "further steps".
- mantas 8y agoThe bad actors learned to remove mods before the inspection and then reinstall them long ago.