3 ms·
Ad hominem ad nauseam... The signatures are results of a nation-wide mail survey first undertaken in 1998. The respondents were selected based on their scienti
by 1gor 18y ago
Ad hominem ad nauseam...
The signatures are results of a nation-wide mail survey first undertaken in 1998. The respondents were selected based on their scientific credentials of publicly accepted quality. All the signatures are done in writing and are available for inspection on your request at the institute.
Since you've just attempted a mass character assassination, do you mind sharing the results of your inquest into the validity of the signatures/qualifications with us?
- Retric 18y agoargumentum ad verecundiam An appeal to authority or argument by authority also known as argument from authority. If you say 50 or 5 billion scientists provide wieght to your argument your already falling under a logical falicy. Responding with an Ad hominem ad nauseam seems reasonable when at least one person that made the list had zero credibility. PS: I see a lot of hand waving and use of vary specific data when more general studies have been done but I don't see any real theory. What model are they using to base their assumptions on and how well tested is it and or what specific flaws have they uncovered in existing research or thery?