3 ms·
I see your point and I agree. You seem to be an experienced reader with an interest in history. History Lapse is meant towards the uninitiated youth who lost in
by domnuprofesor 8y ago
I see your point and I agree. You seem to be an experienced reader with an interest in history. History Lapse is meant towards the uninitiated youth who lost interest in history because it is "boring". You can read more about it in our whitepaper here https://en.historylapse.org/whitepaper https://en.historylapse.org/whitepaper. In this context of operation I maintain my opinion that the UX solution is great.
- marssaxman 8y agoThank you for explaining the context. I appreciate your willingness to engage here. Your characterization of my perspective is correct. I had not heard of your project before encountering this link, and if I've got a moment later I'd be happy to read your paper and find out more about what you are doing. [after reading: this is a great project and I deeply appreciate the amount of thought that went into its design. It would have been nice if there were some way to bring more of that awareness into the initial reading experience, instead of just dropping us into something unfamiliar and confusing, but that's a limitation of the hackernews interface and I'm not sure what you could have done about it other than show up and explain as you are doing here. Keep up the good work!]