5 ms·
> and less interested in school. Though my profession is probably owed to the unsanctioned time I spent online in my youth (especially time away from school),
by microcolonel 8y ago
> and less interested in school.
Though my profession is probably owed to the unsanctioned time I spent online in my youth (especially time away from school), and I luckily never had access to enough unearned money to buy a fast enough computer to play video games, never really played video games much, and still don't now that I have threadrippers, hundreds of gigs of ram, and top tier GPUs sitting around everywhere.
Some parents see the issues with video games as extending to access to computers as a whole, and I think that could have its own social cost.
If I were raising a kid right now, I'd probably have them on a feature phone, and a PC which stops short of playing modern games; but I think a lot of people would struggle with hypocrisy if they did that, since they own gaming hardware and play video games themselves, and my own mother is rather attached to her smartphone.
- skookumchuck 8y ago> I'd probably have them on a feature phone ... Everyone thinks that, and then caves under the pressure.
- microcolonel 8y agoGrow a spine. If you are too weak to withhold a luxury electronic device from a child in your care, you are probably too weak to raise a child in general... I think. I mean, I don't have kids, but I can't imagine being plied into spending hundreds of dollars on something which I don't want even for myself, and which I think is bad for the recipient.
- skookumchuck 8y ago> I don't have kids It's easy to say you'll do this and that with kids, but things change when you have them.