3 ms·

I did. You spent most of it lecturing people who use cars. I explained to you why you were wrong to do so.

• btrettel 8y ago
  Can you explain which parts you believe are lecturing drivers? My post was meant to offer my perspective as a cyclist: driving is more expensive than many appreciate. I wasn't arguing that it was unnecessary; quite the opposite. I don't know what you mean by "Please don't ruin people's lives with your ideas" if you were not referring to taking away someone's license because of debt. As I stated, I don't believe someone should lose their drivers' license because of debt. What is the idea I have that would ruin peoples' lives?
  • saxonww 8y ago
    Just some perspective. I know this is not what you wrote, and probably not what you meant, but what I was thinking when reading your comment was "Car owners are extravagant. I spend a lot on my bike and still spend so much less money than them. Maybe if we suspended licenses some would get a clue." I'm probably not alone in reading it that way, and I'd say many of us would be offended.
    • btrettel 8y ago
      I appreciate your honesty. What I meant was this: Driving is expensive, so one might argue that removing one's ability to drive would help them save money, but that doesn't work when a drivers' license is needed to generate income in the first place.