The article admits this view isnt falsifiable. It's a fun idea but it is a dissapointment to see such a misleading title in scientific american. In a sense, th

The article admits this view isnt falsifiable. It's a fun idea but it is a dissapointment to see such a misleading title in scientific american. In a sense, the idea that only the content of a model matters has always been present in science. Does an electron really exist? Who knows, but people have models which make use of a concept called an electron and they are testable and have superb predictive power. I dont see that this article offers any meaningful contributions to the current understanding.