4 ms·
> Dragonfly was this outrageous So Apple allowing China what is essentially unrestricted access to iCloud data is not[0,1]? For honesty's sake, let's not cherr
by O1111OOO 8y ago
> Dragonfly was this outrageous
So Apple allowing China what is essentially unrestricted access to iCloud data is not[0,1]? For honesty's sake, let's not cherry-pick.
That high-horse you're on only works when applied evenly and without prejudice.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/04/apple-users-icloud-services-personal-data-china-cybersecurity-law-privacy https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/04/apple-...
[1] https://qz.com/1176376/apples-icloud-service-in-china-will-be-managed-by-a-data-firm-started-by-the-government/ https://qz.com/1176376/apples-icloud-service-in-china-will-b...
- thrway190326 8y agoWe were talking about the outrage over Dragonfly, versus the smaller outrage over lack of availability of Apple news. By the way, can you be more specific about iCloud? The Dragonfly claim is that Google would be sharing a list of search queries per telephone number with a state company, to use however they want. Can you be clear regarding the equivalent iCloud functionality? (I don't doubt you, just interested in where the abuse would happen.) Could you give an example?