3 ms·
Different groups such as... Yahoo and Microsoft? https://verizon-postmaster.tumblr.com/post/183699380323/amp-support-in-yahoo-mail https://verizon-postmaster.t
by Ajedi32 8y ago
Different groups such as... Yahoo and Microsoft?
https://verizon-postmaster.tumblr.com/post/183699380323/amp-support-in-yahoo-mail https://verizon-postmaster.tumblr.com/post/183699380323/amp-...
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Outlook-Blog/Support-for-AMP-HTML-preview-in-Outlook-com/ba-p/382832 https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Outlook-Blog/Support-...
- zamadatix 8y agoUsers of AMP do not necessarily have a vested interest in the design beyond "I'm able to use it if I want". This is e.g. the difference (or at least was for the last ~decade) between mail.yahoo.com using a web feature vs Firefox/Chrome/IE/Safari implementing a web feature.
- Ajedi32 8y agoHow about this then? There are members from Microsoft, Twitter, and Pinterest on the project's technical steering committee: https://github.com/ampproject/meta-tsc https://github.com/ampproject/meta-tsc
- zamadatix 8y agoThis is not new information, it just brings us back to where the conversation started. I'm not pointing out that there wasn't an open standards body or that big name corporations were not part of it I'm pointing out none of these had/have a vested interest and bigger control of the implementation beyond how it is consumed.
- Ajedi32 8y agoYou don't think engineers at major companies using the standard have a vested interest in how it is designed? Even considering that those engineers are on a committee whose entire purpose is to influence the design of the developing standard?
- zamadatix 8y agoIndividual engineers may or may not, those companies however stand to make no change in margin by agreeing or disagreeing with Google on how the AMP works behind the scenes.