4 ms·
Yes, but you know, that isn't Google controlling it and these are all member from major internet companies that won't take part in such a "conspiracy".
by cramforce 8y ago
Yes, but you know, that isn't Google controlling it and these are all member from major internet companies that won't take part in such a "conspiracy".
- AaronFriel 8y agoWhy does Google have three members then?
- cramforce 8y agoBecause we do the majority of the work. The governance body size will, however, expand with further non-Google members. So, the hypothetical "you just have to convince only one" is becoming less of an issue over time.
- X-Istence 8y ago^ cramforce works for Google on AMP.
- ganeshkrishnan 8y agoOf course it's always the benevolent Google ramming down their network down our throats. How would AMP bans work? You can't even read any email in any client?
- djanogo 8y agoYou shouldn't comment unless you disclose that your affiliation with AMP team.
- dmitriid 8y agoCan you remind us again how AMP for email came to be? I remember you talking about how transparent the process is, but, alas, you never described it. And to quote another member of the discussions back then, anyone raising concerns: > were closed or locked, and the head of AMP blocked us. You being the head of AMP, of course.
- JohnFen 8y agoI don't find that argument even a little persuasive. Google is the Big Dog there.