3 ms·
I hope nobody will be mislead of the reasons google released AMP and AMP for email. It have nothing to do with performance(for AMP) or interactivity(amp4email)
by altmind 8y ago
I hope nobody will be mislead of the reasons google released AMP and AMP for email. It have nothing to do with performance(for AMP) or interactivity(amp4email) and more with establishing a vendor wallgarden.
The standard is "open like in openxml" - there's a technical commitee, but your input will not be heard.
- fstanis 8y ago> there's a technical commitee, but your input will not be heard. What makes you think input won't be heard?
- barneygale 8y ago^ Note that this is a google employee
- frenchy 8y agoLike OOXML, it's probably mostly the case to woo government to use their proprietary format. Additionally, I think with AMP, you might be able to get your input heard, but only if you run a mail service with millions of users.
- kevingadd 8y agoWhen have your web people ever listened to input? Not Web Audio, not 'autoplay' banning, not AMP, not NPAPI, that's for sure. I was on the Chrome team and your leadership still told me to pound sand. Your leadership deserve nothing but contempt.
- userbinator 8y agoIt'll be heard, but no one will care. Everyone who disagrees with their direction just gets ignored, because they know you're powerless to do anything to them.
- chrisdone 8y agoIt's Google. The only company that hears everything you say and listens to none of it.
- JohnFen 8y agoPast experience, maybe?