4 ms·
I am the OP. I think it was because I was an overseas employee and the founders just didn't shell out equity to people who were not based out of US. I saw the
by jatins 8y ago
I am the OP.
I think it was because I was an overseas employee and the founders just didn't shell out equity to people who were not based out of US. I saw the equity distribution sheet that was disclosed after the acquisition as part of legal requirements and that was indeed true.
IMO, equity represents ownership in the company and should not depend on purchase parity.
- thefujin 8y agoI think you should've mentioned this in your blog post, especially if you're comparing the money you've made from equity to new college grad salary at Facebook
- rpm33 8y ago>I think it was because I was an overseas employee and the founders just didn't shell out equity to people who were not based out of US. Isn't that illegal ?
- ellisv 8y agoWhy would it be illegal?