3 ms·
You know that, the lawyers know that, but how do you expect the content filtering mechanism to know that??? True, for 4'33'' there is a simple rule that they p
by simiones 8y ago
You know that, the lawyers know that, but how do you expect the content filtering mechanism to know that???
True, for 4'33'' there is a simple rule that they probably follow - ignore silence :). But for Fountain (if it ever came up) it's hard to imagine that the difference between a protected copy and a non-protected similar image could really be automatically discovered.
- philpem 8y agoThis is it. A human being can identify the context. Taking Fountain as an example -- a photo of a urinal on a building merchant's website is an illustration of the product they're selling, not an infringement. But the filter doesn't know about context, it just correlates two images... and you get "Comparison with copyrighted work 'Fountain', 75% match". 75% > 0%, so the filter says "non".
- amanaplanacanal 8y agoIsn't this: > decisions to disable access to or remove uploaded content shall be subject to human review intended to handle those cases? I'm not saying that it will be adequate.