5 ms·
I applaud the use of rel="nofollow". The New York Times article seemed to blame both Get Satisfaction and Google, at least in the beginning, and that's ridiculo
by rapind 16y ago
I applaud the use of rel="nofollow". The New York Times article seemed to blame both Get Satisfaction and Google, at least in the beginning, and that's ridiculous.
- ajays 16y agoI just looked at their page, and both the "contact us" and "home" links don't have "nofollow" in them.
- Natsu 16y agoWhy would they need to put nofollow on links to their own site?
- getsat 16y agoHe's referring to this: http://i.imgur.com/KqMcq.png http://i.imgur.com/KqMcq.png From here: http://getsatisfaction.com/decormyeyescom http://getsatisfaction.com/decormyeyescom Despite what the blog entry says, they ARE contributing to the problem.
- Natsu 16y agoI see, so they missed a few links. It appears to have been fixed now, though, because I can no longer find that HTML on the page. I wonder if Google will ever be smart enough to take ranking highly for searches like "scam" or "fraud" into account (without penalizing the people exposing scams and frauds) when computing someone's pagerank?
- getsat 16y agoYour wish is their command: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/being-bad-to-your-customers-is-bad-for.html http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/being-bad-to-your-cus...
- jlees 16y agoSo now it's all Google's fault!