3 ms·
The typical argument is that "tax incentives", whether positive or negative, ultimately come from other people's hard work and money. And those people may not a
by Radim 8y ago
The typical argument is that "tax incentives", whether positive or negative, ultimately come from other people's hard work and money. And those people may not agree with you (the benevolent distributor of incentives) on what "good outcomes" are.
TL;DR: People have their own, often highly idiosyncratic ideas about what's worthwhile and how they want to spend their money.
- andrepd 8y ago>And those people may not agree with you (the benevolent distributor of incentives) I was under the impression that in a democracy there was no single BDFL.
- Radim 8y agoAnd how does that change the explanation, "People have their own, often highly idiosyncratic ideas about what's worthwhile and how they want to spend their money.", one way or another?