> Sure, some people can't handle lactose, they have different responses to booze, etc. That different from evolution. When those that can handle smth (booze, l

> Sure, some people can't handle lactose, they have different responses to booze, etc. That different from evolution. When those that can handle smth (booze, lactose) better produce more offspring, that selective breeding. Evolving to be better off with lactose-all-life-long or booze takes a lot (A LOT) longer. Non of that is demonstrated for either lactose or booze. > And I think that's my dispute: the world isn't pure, nature isn't pure, our bodies aren't pure. So lets create all kinds of molecules that the have never been seen before and spread them in the food supply to increase yields/sales, because we serving the holy purpose of impurity. I prefer I have the choice as a consumer. And I think give the choice at equal cost most people will choose poison-free. > If we can get the prices on organic food down to where we can feed cities without famines, sure. Easy, but it comes at a cost. For instance "no more animal products", this will open up enough land and subsidy budget to make organic plant-based for everyone viable. Animal product another ugly-ass industry right there.