Assange himself would agree that the emmotional impact was strengthened and has said so in his interviews: his aim is to get the biggest political impact to hon

Assange himself would agree that the emmotional impact was strengthened and has said so in his interviews: his aim is to get the biggest political impact to honour the courage of the submitter. The full video was an hour long if I recall and this was condensed into a watchable 10 minutes. Nothing was added apart from annotations and the original video was released. The New York Times is not to be trusted; they are begrudgingly reporting on these leaks. I shall give you concrete evidence that there is heavy censorship at that paper: "Frago 242" (short for Fragmentary Order 242), was a high level dictat to troops to ignore torture by Iraqi forces, or at least not to intervene directly. This was a key expose for that release, and Assange talks of a story actually getting killed by the editors - 140 results Guardian.co.uk http://www.google.co.uk/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=frago+242#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=%22frago+242%22+site:guardian.co.uk&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=ec580a23bbcb13e1 http://www.google.co.uk/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&... And buried in some community comment section a solitary 1 result at NYTimes.com http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=despeigle#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=site:nytimes.com+%22frago+242%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=ec580a23bbcb13e1 http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&... You are not being fair to Wikileaks.