3 ms·
I don't think that's the question. No one is always trustworthy. You hope to approximate the truth from multiple sources, and the diversity of agendas and per
by Volscio 16y ago
I don't think that's the question. No one is always trustworthy. You hope to approximate the truth from multiple sources, and the diversity of agendas and perspectives provides the best prism to look through.
Corroboration, in other words.
- Qz 16y agoFrom that perspective I simply see Wikileaks as just another diverse agenda and perspective. We still have to approximate the truth.