4 ms·
Let's say you're a Politburo member who has developed serious moral qualms about what your regime is doing. You have three options: 1) Stick with business as
by CamperBob 16y ago
Let's say you're a Politburo member who has developed serious moral qualms about what your regime is doing. You have three options:
1) Stick with business as usual. Go along to get along.
2) Quietly retire to "spend more time with your family" or for "health reasons."
3) Use your position to betray your country as a spy, working for what is arguably a greater good.
Option 3) is what this Politburo member went with. Just like delivering pizzas, installing roof shingles, or maintaining power lines, espionage and treason comes with certain risks. This is true whether you're working for the good guys or the bad guys. This is one of those risks. He knew, or could reasonably have been expected to know, what he was doing.
I agree with the comment from the other thread: Wikileaks is putting the whole US government through a full-body scanner. Frankly, I'm tired of governments having all the illegal search-and-seizure fun. Now we get to play, too.
- GHFigs 16y agoThis is one of those risks. In other words, Wikileaks is making it riskier for dissidents to work as US informants. Gee, thanks, Julian.
- CamperBob 16y agoThe idea being to reduce the need for dissidents to operate at all. Transparency is either a good thing, or a bad thing, and I'd like to remain optimistic at this point.
- YuriNiyazov 16y agoYou say "gee thanks" as if somewhere in Julian's stated intentions is "helping the US government." - it obviously isn't, and one of his stated objectives is to change how governments work.
- GHFigs 16y agoI am vastly more concerned with real-world consequences than stated intentions.