3 ms·
This seems pretty straightforward. I get worried about the complexities of nesting routes, but then I have a fairly simple use-case anyway so I doubt I'll get i
by jcovingt 8y ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I get worried about the complexities of nesting routes, but then I have a fairly simple use-case anyway so I doubt I'll get into the weeds.
Similar to another commenter, it never seemed quite natural to me to define routes in jsx. Your solution looks more like a server-side routing table and I appreciate that!