3 ms·
I think the argument is something like: It is not profitable to provide the current level of service to rural areas. Because of the high productivity of urban a
by ed312 8y ago
I think the argument is something like: It is not profitable to provide the current level of service to rural areas. Because of the high productivity of urban areas, we can redistribute resources and improve rural public infrastructure.
- wnevets 8y agoBeyond that, it required interference of the free market by the federal government https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Electrification_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Electrification_Act
- tonyedgecombe 8y agoI sometimes think we should give the free market zealots what they want, as a punishment.