4 ms·
So the rifle went from initial acceptance, including these kinds of stupid last-minute design changes that are common in any project, to large-scale combat depl
by stcredzero 8y ago
So the rifle went from initial acceptance, including these kinds of stupid last-minute design changes that are common in any project, to large-scale combat deployment within a year; normally, there would have been years of incremental usage to catch these bugs
Large organization needs to roll out a new model on an accelerated timescale. Cost cutting and time saving decisions are made, which have disastrous synergistic effects in the field.
Sounds very familiar.
EDIT: In order to understand the design genius of the AR-15/M-16 rifle, hold 50 rounds of 9mm pistol ammunition in your hand, then 50 rounds of 5.56 ammo. It varies by the particular kinds of ammunition, but on average, they weigh around the same. Yet the rifle is many times more powerful. How is this so?
1) More propellant weighs a lot less than more lead. 2) Energy goes up by the square of velocity.
- azernik 8y agoEverything you said, but also 3) a longer barrel means you get more of the energy of the propellant into the bullet instead of into the surrounding air.
- stcredzero 8y ago3) is in the service of 2) more velocity. Lately, I've been thinking, why have a pistol as a backup sidearm at all? Why not something like a Kel-Tec Sub2000, just slightly smaller, perhaps with a 10" barrel, but also shoulder-able?
- azernik 8y agoUsually at that weight range militaries prefer to issue submachine guns or Personal Defence Weapons.
- stcredzero 8y agoI said something like a Sub2000, not exactly a Sub2000. I bet a 10" short barrel rifle of the same general layout could be made to weigh well under 3 pounds.