3 ms·

> it shuold have been a better C. It failed. It was supposed to be more secure than C. It failed. If it's worse and less secure than C, why is it so popular? W

by jhasse 8y ago

> it shuold have been a better C. It failed. It was supposed to be more secure than C. It failed. If it's worse and less secure than C, why is it so popular? Why didn't all people continue to use C?

aidenn0 8y ago
It's not strictly better than C; that dosen't mean it's worse either. Language "goodness" isn't single-dimensional.