I like the idea but I don't know if I agree with the proposed approach to reviews. Personally, at a minimum, I would like to see the following from every review

I like the idea but I don't know if I agree with the proposed approach to reviews. Personally, at a minimum, I would like to see the following from every reviewer: A structured summary- background, objectives, data sources, synthesis methods used, results, limitations, conclusions and the implications of important findings drawn by the article. In more detail: An introduction that presents the problem and the issues dealt with. An assessment of the methods which describes the research and the evaluation process; specifies the number of studies references and gives a brief evaluation of their validity. A description of conclusions/results and their quality based on identifiable and preconceived academic/professional metrics. A strong summary of conclusions, limitations of those conclusions and the outcomes of the procedure used for the research. I would really love to see reviews of reviews as well as a reviewers rating system (individual reviewers should have their own ratings) but given the limited number of reviewers that maybe asking too much.