It does sound a little snarky but at the same time it's a real good point -- the article says "... met with hostility from the Rust & Cargo teams" and yet you c

It does sound a little snarky but at the same time it's a real good point -- the article says "... met with hostility from the Rust & Cargo teams" and yet you cite "largely based on this discussion [of some other team using Rust to develop their project]." So if this is an error on your part, maybe you could issue a correction without a specific comment or rebuttal from anyone. EDIT: your edit makes you seem a little rash. I get that it might be overwhelming because the Rust Evangelism Strike Force (†) has showed up here but take some time to appreciate what folks are writing. Your article regarding Rust is naturally controversial and is filled with good points and bad ones. People will naturally pile on the bad ones. (†) Tongue in cheek, I'm probably a charter member