3 ms·
> businesses need to make money This is another reason to prefer federation: your social graph is not owned by (at the mercy of) a business whose interests may
by tgragnato 8y ago
> businesses need to make money
This is another reason to prefer federation: your social graph is not owned by (at the mercy of) a business whose interests may not even be aligned with yours (bad advertising is only one of the many consequences of this).
> extreme
I'd not call "there's something better" an extreme approach. The maintenance burden is what makes federated services difficult to operate. That's the issue right now, but people are working to resolve that too.
> https://blog.datproject.org/2019/03/22/three-protocols-and-a-future-of-the-decentralized-internet/ https://blog.datproject.org/2019/03/22/three-protocols-and-a...
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19466929 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19466929
- skinnymuch 8y agoI’d love federation to work out. I’ve unfortunately lost most hope. The comments there show other problems too. Other problems that may never be solved. For example not being able to take your social graph with you if you change Mastodon instances. Having issues with the admin or an instance seems like it’ll happen often enough. But you’re essentially punished for that. That’s just one example. It is good though that people are trying to solve the problems. Hopefully my cynicism will be proven wrong and I’ll only be happy about that.