3 ms·
Easy: GNU/Linux system are vastly less vulnerable than Windows systems, for at least 2 reasons. (1) Their users tend to actually know how computers work. Theref
by loup-vaillant 16y ago
Easy: GNU/Linux system are vastly less vulnerable than Windows systems, for at least 2 reasons. (1) Their users tend to actually know how computers work. Therefore they are far less vulnerable to mind attacks (such as hot_chick.jpg.exe). (2) They are more up to date. This is partly a consequence of 1 (users care about security patches), and of "piracy" (illegitimates copies of Windows tend to not be updated frequently).
Also, there are many GNU/Linux distributions out there. So, a security breach on one system may not be there on another. Plus, the virus has to be portable.
Anyway, this focus on viruses is probably misleading: GNU/Linux systems are attacked. Regularly. For instance, any new machine with an ssh login will log more than 500 login attempts a day before the end of the first week. Those attacks may just not attempt to install a virus. They do some other "interesting" stuff, though, like adding a web page at www.yoursite.com/secret-loc/gimme-credit-card-number.html, or sending spam.
- bediger 16y agoSomeone "caught" one of those SSH scans recently. It's the "Chuck NOrris" botnet, which apparently runs on MIPS-based DSL, wireless routers: http://www.muni.cz/ics/research/cyber/files/chuck_norris.pdf http://www.muni.cz/ics/research/cyber/files/chuck_norris.pdf That's not exactly the tidal wave of viruses, trojans, BHOs, worms, etc that Windows gets. Even supposing an 'attach' from a Chuck Norris botnetted router suceeded in guessing a user ID and password via SSH, the MIPSEL code wouldn't run on your x86 or x86_84 linux box. You can still download the code that guy got: http://safu.stream-portal.org/pwnd.tgz http://safu.stream-portal.org/pwnd.tgz Also, the "fractured" nature of the Linux software base comes to its rescue, eh? No strength in monoculture here?