3 ms·
> It keeps juniors from pushing bad code without peer review. It keeps all developers from pushing code without peer review. (In my experience, it’s just as o
by jsjohnst 8y ago
> It keeps juniors from pushing bad code without peer review.
It keeps all developers from pushing code without peer review.
(In my experience, it’s just as often senior devs pushing broken code because “this was a simple change, why does it need review?” and it in fact being broken. Furthermore, doing PRs is not solely to “check for mistakes”, they are also used for knowledge sharing, among other reasons)
- giancarlostoro 8y ago> It keeps all developers from pushing code without peer review. This is true, I don't know why I went with juniors.
- marmaduke 8y agoBecause junior is a state of mind not an age