6 ms·
Labwork with as loosely defined goals as life ("reproduce", "accelerate rise of entropy") is costly. It's a robust, deep objective long-term, but extremely inar
by Radim 8y ago
Labwork with as loosely defined goals as life ("reproduce", "accelerate rise of entropy") is costly. It's a robust, deep objective long-term, but extremely inarticulate with poor ROI short-term.
A species of spider nailing down how to live on a particular type of rock on a particular island, in a very particular environment over millions of years, is simply not articulate enough "lab work".
Which is of course not an argument for killing off species. But it's an argument against approaching that moral question from such utilitarian perspective. You might easily end up with results you don't like, once you do the cost/benefit analysis in a less hand-wavy manner.
- _Schizotypy 8y agoI think the fact that it IS so inarticulate, but that the work has already been put in, is one of the best reasons to protect biodiversity
- Radim 8y agoThe "sunk cost" fallacy :-)
- _Schizotypy 8y agoyep life was wasteful, time to wipe it out and start over amirite?