3 ms·
What I was trying to communicate was that the Turing machine believed to represent the limits of what is physically possible. So then you have turing machines
by urgoroger 8y ago
What I was trying to communicate was that the Turing machine believed to represent the limits of what is physically possible. So then you have
turing machines >= brain (since a brain is physical)
and
brain >= turing machine (by simulation argument)
The conclusion is the brain and Turing machine can do the same thing (brain = turing machine).
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- User23 8y ago> What I was trying to communicate was that the Turing machine believed to represent the limits of what is physically possible Another religious tenet with no observable basis. Where did so many hackers get this misconception that computable and physically possible are proven to be the same? Many claim the Church-Turing thesis shows this. Have they never read it carefully?